Our very best articles are called featured articles. They're articles without spelling mistakes, with a lot of pictures, with internal and external links, sources, references and see also's. They are large enough and the content is correct.

The voting archive can be found here.

Contents 1 Featured articles 2 New FA's 2.1 Sylvania 2.2 2008 2.3 Oceana (language) 2.4 King Arthur III of Lovia 2.5 Communist Party of Lovia (neo-marxist) 2.6 Sir John Lashawn 2.7 2010 Congress 2.8 Lovian Civil War 2.9 King Dimitri I of Lovia 2.10 Seven 2.11 Positive Lovia 2.12 Jhon Lewis 3 Candidates for deletion 3.1 Constitution 3.2 Propose!

Featured articles Edit

Some articles were adopted as featured articles to have a base. From now on, FA's can only be admitted after a vote.

• The National Constitution of the Kingdom of Lovia
• Hurbanova
• Little Frisco Railway Station
• Lovian Museum for Modern Art
• Noble City
• Palati Daidalo
• Transcity Railway Station
• Veprom
• Oceana (language)
• Sylvania
• Communist Party of Lovia (neo-marxist)
• Lovian Civil War

New FA's Edit

Congress Voting Options {{pro}} resulting in: Pro {{contra}} gives: Contra {{abstention}} gives: Abstention

Sylvania Edit

• Pro Dimitri 19:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• Pro Lokixx 19:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

  VOTE please!

• Pro Very good. George Matthews 10:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
• Pro YURI MEDVEDEV 06:09, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro, the national index table could be improved, so, I give my full support --Lars Washington 14:59, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Contra --OWTB 10:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC) seal-opsomming, national index table looks messy
• Contra See OWTB Bucurestean 11:47, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro BastardRoyale 17:59, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
• ...

This proposal is accepted!

2008 Edit

One of our best and VERY complete! Dimitri 14:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

• Pro Pierlot McCrooke 06:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Pro George Matthews 15:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Pro --OWTB 10:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• Pro Jamal Hustróva 10:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC) za
• Pro YURI MEDVEDEV 06:09, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro Naranja! --Lars Washington 14:54, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro BastardRoyale 18:00, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Contra Dated. Dimitri 18:00, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

  Indeed, it's from 2008! :P Il Duce Octavian 12:21, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

• ...

Oceana (language) Edit

• Pro Bucurestean 11:44, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 11:46, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

  PLEASE VOTE! --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 19:03, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

• Pro very professional! YURI MEDVEDEV 06:09, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro I like this, first time I saw the picture. Makes me feel Naranja! --Lars Washington 14:59, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro Do have to be MOTC to vote? well if not... Pro!Marcus Villanova 19:23, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

  No, this vote is for everybody :) --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 19:25, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

  Cool! Now Vote!Marcus Villanova 19:36, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

• Pro BastardRoyale 18:00, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Neutral Good, I think. Dimitri 18:00, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
• Pro Semyon Edikovich 09:29, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
• ...

This proposal is accepted!

King Arthur III of LoviaEdit

1. Pro YURI MEDVEDEV 17:36, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
2. Pro BastardRoyale 18:00, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
3. Contra Needs to be refined first. Also, no sources and references. Not fully embedded yet. Dimitri 18:00, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

I know its far from perfect, but could you help me to improve it? I am not as familiar with Lovia as you are. BastardRoyale 18:09, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

It does have 'potential'. Perhaps with a little help? YURI MEDVEDEV 06:40, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Yours, perhaps? ;-) BastardRoyale 08:45, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy too, but is the little issue you had with Dimitri already fixed? YURI MEDVEDEV 08:56, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

It is already fixed alright! Luckily it is. >>.<< BastardRoyale 14:03, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

1. Pro The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:18, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
2. Pro (only because he weighed over 300 pounds, otherwise I would have voted contra) Il Duce Octavian 12:20, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
3. ...

So... it has enough support? Why not let it pass? The glorious First Consul of Rome 04:36, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

Communist Party of Lovia (neo-marxist) Edit

1. Pro YURI MEDVEDEV 16:10, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
2. Pro Jon Johnson 16:13, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
3. Pro BastardRoyale 17:59, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
4. Pro Dimitri 18:00, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
5. Neutral We can't make every Party Page a Featured Article. It's good but doesn't need to be a FA. Marcus Villanova WLP 20:20, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

   I think it is one of the best articles on the wiki. And I don't say this just because it's my part. YURI MEDVEDEV 08:39, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

   I know it is not disagreeing, i'll change tto neutreal. Marcus Villanova WLP 14:19, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

6. Contra ! Il Duce Octavian 12:16, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Sir John LashawnEdit

1. Pro BastardRoyale 08:50, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
2. Pro Dr. Magnus 12:37, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
3. Neutral - it could use some changes in the lay-out but the content is alright. YURI MEDVEDEV 12:41, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
4. Pro Why not? The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:21, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

2010 CongressEdit

1. Pro SjorskingmaWikistad 12:35, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
2. Pro Dr. Magnus 12:36, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
3. Pro - very complete, thumbs up! YURI MEDVEDEV 12:41, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
4. Pro - But it needs to be updated and whole Marcus Villanova WLP 20:20, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
5. Pro - I am Sinterklaas today! The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:22, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Lovian Civil WarEdit

The sooner this is featured on the Main Page instead of "The Lovely", the better! The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:03, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

1. Pro The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:03, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
2. Pro Il Duce Octavian 12:06, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
3. Contra --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 12:06, October 26, 2011 (UTC) I'm sorry: bad lay-out, just a time line...

   This "one front" isn't really working out and this attitude isn't working! The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:07, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

   You don't believe my vote is right, Oos? Do I have to put you back on the blacklist, hm? Il Duce Octavian 12:08, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

   There is a difference in Lovia and Wikination, just as there is a difference between Prime Minister and Bureaucrat. --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 12:09, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

   There is a difference between supporting and not supporting the Duke too! He will be harsh on you if you won't obey! Il Duce Octavian 12:10, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

   Good Prime Minister! You may be my Mano Sinistra! (Left hand ) Il Duce Octavian 12:13, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

4. Pro --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 12:12, October 26, 2011 (UTC) :'(
5. Pro (don't want to be blacklisted) --Nikolai Koshkov, a.k.a Semyon 12:45, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
6. Contra Same as Oos's striken reason. Not good enough for featured. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 16:12, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
7. Pro --J•t 23:12, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

HELLO? --J•t 23:05, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Passed - and replacing The Lovely. :)

Sorry, but this will not pass. It is a horribly made article, just a huge timeline, an infobox, and a short intro. Most of the pro votes are because people don't want to get blacklisted by Octavian. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 14:23, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. This is a big no. --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 17:48, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

King Dimitri I of LoviaEdit

I think this is a well made article. I've fixed some grammar issues, changed some future tense to past tense, and added some information. It should be perfect for being featured after one and a half years of The Lovely (which, don't get me wrong, is quite lovely. . .). —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 23:44, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

1. Pro —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 23:44, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
2. Pro It's about damn time the Lovely get replaced. Been up their waaaaaaaaaay too long if y'all ask me. The glorious First Consul of Rome 04:35, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
3. Pro --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 11:55, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

I'll just add this, since no one else cares. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 18:45, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

SevenEdit

Definitely one of our best. Semyon did a great job on it. --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 15:46, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

1. Pro --OuWTB^sjrief-mich 15:46, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
2. Neutral Don't want to be falsely modest (that's not idiomatic, but oh well), I do think it's a good article, but Kings is still a lot better. --Semyon 16:21, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
3. Neutral Needs a longer intro. If that's fixed, I'm pro. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:07, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Positive LoviaEdit

Because it is one of our most developed political party articles on the wiki, and I feel that it is an excellent example of a well formatted, wikified article. — Christopher Costello ^{(Pikapi • Chat • What's up)} 16:43, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Pro — Christopher Costello ^{(Pikapi • Chat • What's up)} 16:43, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
• Pro Wabba The I (talk) 16:45, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
• Neutral I don't know. . . a lot of parts seem like advertisement and it's a bit biased. At parts it even seems to be written like you are following Costello's life. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 16:48, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Well I was one of the only authors, so I understand what you mean. Give me an example and I'll see what I can do. — Christopher Costello ^{(Pikapi • Chat • What's up)} 16:52, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• The intro and the history section, mostly. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:36, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Pro Happy65 ^{Talk CNP} 17:08, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Jhon LewisEdit

It is a long page with enough information about his political carreer, acting carreer, family. I will add some pictures soon and ... say what you want about it. Wabba The I (talk) 17:45, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

• Pro Wabba The I (talk) 17:45, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
• Neutral Happy65 ^{Talk CNP} 20:27, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Candidates for deletion Edit

Constitution Edit

It will be burned anyways.

• Pro Il Duce Octavian 12:12, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Pro One for all, and all for one! The glorious First Consul of Rome 12:13, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Contra —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:09, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

On second though, I'd be kinda silly to delete the entire constitution, and I am way to lazy to rewrite the whole thing. We should keep it, if it is abolished then we keep it for historic purposes... I'm being a bully by wanting to delete it, lol. Guess I got too much carried away. The glorious First Consul of Rome 20:10, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

We won´t need it. Don´t oppose the Emperor. --Il Duce Octavian 20:13, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Propose! Edit

...