Talk: Not A Normal Day

Revision as of 14:23, 25 May 2015

Cover.

Okay, see if I got this straight:

"The book is about Sam, a normal girl. But on a day she wakes up and everything else. The book is a book with romantic, comedy and voltage (?) "

Very interesting. I'll buy it! The Master's Voice 20:41, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

Haha, the above made me laugh. I'm buying it too. --Semyon 10:57, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Haha, awesome!

The glorious First Consul of Rome 11:08, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

(pun intended) This book will shock you Pierlot McCrooke 11:43, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Do I detect sarcasm, Semyon? :P Also, what does that plot description actually mean? :P 77topaz (talk) 22:15, April 29, 2015 (UTC)

Such a great work doesn't require a plot. :o And I wasn't actually trying to be sarcastic. The idea of this being great literature pleases me. --Semyon 22:33, April 29, 2015 (UTC)

I had a great idea. We should write the novel in chat, as a stream of consciousness. --Semyon 22:35, April 29, 2015 (UTC)

I'm fairly sure that were the page says "voltage", Wabba tried to write spanning but put it through an automatic translator, and he did not realise that the translator had translated the wrong meaning of spanning (i.e. electrical instead of emotional spanning). But maybe he actually did intend this to be a work of modernist literature. :P 77topaz (talk) 03:42, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

That certainly makes sense. I'm Contra changing the page, though. :P --Semyon 09:11, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

I think you and topaz are over thinking this. I think voltage is certainly something to do with the underlying electrifying meaning of the way that normality became un-normal and everything else. Hoffmann KunarianTALK 09:26, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

Why?

Haters Wabba The I (talk) 13:50, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry. The cover was a step too far, so I've deleted it. To be clear, we're not trying to make fun of you. The English mistakes on the page are perfectly understandable, as Topaz explained. We turned it into a modernist novel because it seemed amusing, and it's not aimed personally at you. --Semyon 14:23, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ==Why?==
 Haters [[User:Wabba The I|Wabba The I]] ([[User talk:Wabba The I|talk]]) 13:50, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
+:I'm sorry. The cover was a step too far, so I've deleted it. To be clear, we're not trying to make fun of you. The English mistakes on the page are perfectly understandable, as Topaz explained. We turned it into a modernist novel because it seemed amusing, and it's not aimed personally at you. --[[User:Semyon|Semyon]] 14:23, May 25, 2015 (UTC)