# Talk:Count to 95

## Back to page

3,630pages on
this wiki

Why a delete candidate? Just because it's off-topic does not mean it should be deleted. Also TM please explain why delete it before you do. :o UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 23:20, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

TM can't delete it himself, as he's not an admin. 77topaz (talk) 05:10, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

It's spam. :o TimeMaster (talkcontribs) 02:53, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

So is your talk page. :P 77topaz (talk) 05:08, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
But I'm just so takaviki that my talk page is spam :o UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 06:54, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
I meant TimeMaster's talk page. :o 77topaz (talk) 08:39, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Do I look like a spammer to you? :o UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 03:00, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Yes :o TimeMaster (talkcontribs) 04:17, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

OK :o Some admin block me :o UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 04:48, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

:o To get on-topic. We should've started with 0 :o --OuWTB 08:38, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Also, "count to infinity" would be a more poetic name :o --OuWTB 08:49, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
From the series of events surrounding TimeMaster's talk page, though, it can be concluded that that would be impossible. :( 77topaz (talk) 08:58, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
All natural numbers. See, I've counted to infinity :P --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 09:48, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
Only because you picked a countably infinite set. :o 77topaz (talk) 10:08, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
You guys nerdy though :'( --OuWTB 10:01, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
You stupid though :'( --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 10:02, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
You hurting me though :'( --OuWTB 10:08, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
You using "nerd" as a derogatory term hurts us though :'( 77topaz (talk) 10:09, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
True :o --OuWTB 10:11, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
You gotta agree you sort of a stereotype though :P --OuWTB 10:11, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
Not really though :P You a Limburgish alcoholic stereotype though :P 77topaz (talk) 10:12, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
1. You good at maths; 2. you wear glasses; 3. you active in dubious internet communities :o --OuWTB 10:18, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
1. Klýxef; 2. Klýxef; 3. Is this a dubious community? :o 77topaz (talk) 10:21, July 17, 2015 (UTC) 1. You're Limburgish; 2. You're an alcoholic; 3. You're active in dubious Internet communities. :o
After all these years, I'm still not sure what I'm actually doing here though :o --OuWTB 10:24, July 17, 2015 (UTC) I'm cute too :3
Getting good friends :o --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 10:27, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
:o Not sure how to cope with this information :P --OuWTB 10:29, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
I thought you had a well-established coping mechanism already. :o 77topaz (talk) 10:31, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
He can cope with alcohol but not with wisdom :'( --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 10:32, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
He uses alcohol to cope with wisdom. :o 77topaz (talk) 10:34, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
:P --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 10:37, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
I use alcohol to prevent my wisdom from making me nerdy :o --OuWTB 10:38, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
You should use it to prevent you from getting stupid though :o --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 10:42, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
I'm underage, so I can't drink alcohol :o UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 10:42, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
There's a difference between can't and don't cuz people say I can't though :o --OuWTB 10:44, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

## This forum is amazing Edit

What say? :o --UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 10:45, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

You cute :3 --OuWTB 10:46, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
It's not going to be deleted :o --UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 05:12, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

## Qytokant's made an error Edit

Oos's age + one year ago = 22 + 21 = 43

Oos's age + next year = 22 + 23 = 45 :o --OuWTB 10:53, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

[1] :o --OuWTB 10:54, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I only had a 9 for maths this time :'( --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 10:58, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Your European grading system? :o UnfazedEveryman Annoy Me 10:59, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

## Wait... Edit

what have I stumbled upon here? :P MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 02:40, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

A lot of nerdy humour. :o 77topaz (talk) 08:24, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

OK. But why? Was this somebody's attempt to turn the wiki into a forum? MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 10:21, April 26, 2017 (UTC)
The forum feature is an established Wikia feature. :o 77topaz (talk) 11:18, April 26, 2017 (UTC)
But why this game? MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 01:21, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
Because UnfazedEveryman (now known as FictiveJ) was fond of random things like that. 77topaz (talk) 01:56, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, I saw that user's talk page. I think that was the person who the wiki community considered to block? MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 02:01, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
Yes, he was blocked once for making random vandalism-like edits (replacing "dialect" with "dijålekt" (the Burenian spelling) in articles on this wiki, for example). 77topaz (talk) 06:42, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
I actually liked this game, we should do this again :o Wabba The I (talk) 07:53, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
I think it's protected though. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 22:59, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
What about creating another forum, "Count to 131"? Wabba The I (talk) 14:42, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Why 131? MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 22:55, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Let's count to 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 [most zeroes/whatever removed] instead. TimeMaster (talkcontribs) 23:04, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

That's too much. I'm sure the universe would explode before we ever get there. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 00:14, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
I've already counted way beyond there though... :o --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 13:27, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
Stating a collective word does not imply you actually counted all numbers. As counting implies all numbers are to be produced separately, which you have not done. Bart K (talk) 19:54, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
If everyone's okay, I will start this again. :o Wabba The I (talk) 19:58, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

I'm OK. TimeMaster probably isn't. :o MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 23:23, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

TM always disagrees though :o --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 18:08, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Did Bart just diss Qytokant here? :o --OuWTB 08:54, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

I think so. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 09:26, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
I liked Tåpas' reaction better :'( --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 18:08, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
What reaction? MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 22:58, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
My reaction when 4kant originally wrote that in 2015. 77topaz (talk) 23:06, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
I suppose if it was something like 4.0002, 4.0006, 4.0009, 4.0010109, 4.001020000043, 4.001020207 etc, then you could never get there: you have an uncountably infinite set. But since we're only using whole numbers, well... MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 00:10, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
Well, we coounting right? So you can't use uncountable numbers, cuz u can't count 'em :o --OuWTB 11:00, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
Indeed. Therefore 4kant is right. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 11:14, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
You can't have uncountable numbers, only uncountable sets. :o 77topaz (talk) 12:34, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I dare you to count to 4,21 :o --OuWTB 14:08, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
What Tåpas means is that the word "uncountable" applies to sets and not to numbers; therefore the phrase "uncountable number" is meaningless :o --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 14:38, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
Let's see how everybody likes trying to count in decimals. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 22:03, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
This is exactly why I dislike Tåpas. He so nerdy though :'( --OuWTB 11:27, May 20, 2017 (UTC)
You dislike all nerds? :'( --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 16:32, May 20, 2017 (UTC)

I hate topaz because he's ahead of me in his education but also roughly the same age which is an unacceptable combination. Need to be the best person on Earth my age but that's impossible. STOP SPAMMING WITH FUCKING COUNTING THOUGH. WRITE SOME FUCKING ARTICLES IF YOU WANT TO EDIT OR SOMETHING TimeMaster (talkcontribs) 16:55, May 20, 2017 (UTC)